Everything You Want to Know About MOFs Characterization
Recently, the 2025 Nobel Prize in Chemistry was awarded to Susumu Kitagawa, Richard Robson, and Omar Yaghi in recognition of “their development of metal–organic frameworks (MOFs).” The three laureates created molecular structures with enormous internal spaces, allowing gases and other chemical species to flow through them. These structures, known as Metal–Organic Frameworks (MOFs), have applications ranging from extracting water from desert air and capturing carbon dioxide, to storing toxic gases and catalyzing chemical reactions. Metal–Organic Frameworks (MOFs) are a class of crystalline porous materials formed by metal ions or clusters linked via organic ligands (Figure 1). Their structures can be envisioned as a three-dimensional network of “metal nodes + organic linkers,” combining the stability of inorganic materials with the design flexibility of organic chemistry. This versatile construction allows MOFs to be composed of almost any metal from the periodic table and a wide variety of ligands, such as carboxylates, imidazolates, or phosphonates, enabling precise control over pore size, polarity, and chemical environment. Figure 1. Schematic of a Metal–Organic Framework Since the first permanent-porosity MOFs appeared in the 1990s, thousands of structural frameworks have been developed, including classic examples like HKUST-1 and MIL-101. They exhibit ultrahigh specific surface areas and pore volumes, offering unique properties for gas adsorption, hydrogen storage, separation, catalysis, and even drug delivery. Some flexible MOFs can undergo reversible structural changes in response to adsorption or temperature, showing dynamic behaviors such as “breathing effects.” Thanks to their diversity, tunability, and functionalization, MOFs have become a core topic in porous materials research and provide a solid scientific foundation for studying adsorption performance and characterization methods. MOFs Characterization The fundamental characterization of MOFs typically includes powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) patterns to determine crystallinity and phase purity, and nitrogen (N₂) adsorption/desorption isotherms to validate the pore structure and calculate apparent surface area. Other commonly used complementary techniques include: Thermogravimetric Analysis (TGA): Evaluates thermal stability and can estimate pore volume in some cases. Water Stability Tests: Assesses structural stability in water and across different pH conditions. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM): Measures crystal size and morphology, and can be combined with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) for elemental composition and distribution. Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) Spectroscopy: Analyzes overall sample purity and can quantify ligand ratios in mixed-ligand MOFs. Inductively Coupled Plasma Optical Emission Spectroscopy (ICP-OES): Determines sample purity and elemental ratios. Diffuse Reflect...